Air Supply Mini-Mate Wearable Air AS180i- Our new "Millennium Model" Air Supply now with 30% greater output the most popular model, is the top of the line in personal air purification. Weighing in at a sleek 1.5 ounces, this Air Supply will help to purify your breathing space with the most powerful output that we have available. This unit also comes with a breakaway strap for user safety. Also comes with Solid Platinum Emitter Electroplated Gold Grid. This is the ultimate in advanced plasma discharge design. 2.5" X 1.5" X .85" Weight 1.5 ounces. model available for export. Robert Haru Fisher former editor of Fodors and assistant editor to Frommers is a world class expert on travel and has written many books and lectured worldwide, has this to say about our AirSupply AS150MM Personal Air Purifier: "I believe my purifier, Air Supply works" "I wear mine on every Excerpted Quotations from TRAVEL TECH: DO AIR PURIFIERS WORK

ON PLANE TRIPS By Robert Haru Fisher Jan 2, 2008 (Lithium Batteries OK on AirPlanes according to the Department of CREATED and INVENTED HERE! Best available personal air purification at transcript of the Air Supply as described on  GoodThe Ache: In cold and flu season, pathogens spread when people are crammed into close quarters, such as airplanes and cars. The Claim: Personal air purifiers worn around the neck clean the air in the wearer’s breathing zone of viruses and bacteria as well as allergens, say companies that sell them. honeywell air purifier indiaThe Verdict: The devices helped clear a variety of test particles from the air in lab tests, but scientists say there’s no proof they have any health benefit in real conditions. rabbit air purifier coupon 2013“It sounds like it worked in a laboratory setting, but that doesn’t say anything about whether it works in real life,” says Darryl C. Zeldin, scientific director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, an arm of the National Institutes of Health. air duct cleaning naperville il

Theoretically it is possible that the devices might help reduce transmission of pathogens, or ease asthma symptoms, but proof is needed, he adds. Personal air purifiers work by emitting electrically charged molecules or atoms called ions, companies say. The ions transfer the charge to particles—such as one carrying a flu virus—in the user’s breathing zone and since like-charged particles repel each other, they are pushed out of the breathing zone, companies say. The AirSupply Minimate from Wein Products Inc. in Los Angeles, emits positive ions and fits in the palm of the hand. The AirTamer A310, new last year from Headwaters Inc.% in Marblehead, Mass., emits negative ions. It recharges through a USB port and holds the charge for 150 hours of continuous use, says company co-founder Troy Anderson. Both devices have suggested prices of $150. In lab tests funded by Headwaters, the AirTamer was found to efficiently clear cigarette smoke, Mr. Anderson says. In research partly funded by the company, Wein’s technology has undergone a battery of testing by University of Cincinnati scientists.

In a study, published in the journal Indoor Air in 2005, a prototype of the Minimate was tested for removal of particles, including salt particles in a variety of sizes and a bacterium that doesn’t usually cause disease. It cleared the air of half of the test particles after 15 minutes, and nearly all of them within 90 minutes, according to the results. The particles remain present on surfaces, “but at least you reduce inhalation exposure,” says study author Sergey A. Grinshpun, a professor of environmental health at the university. Since the particles used in the test were similar to the size of bacteria and particles carrying infectious viruses, it wasn’t necessary to use infectious particles in the test, he adds. Dr. Grinshpun’s study appears nicely done, but doesn’t reflect real-life conditions, says Werner E. Bischoff, an infectious-disease specialist at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. In the lab tests, the particles are introduced only once and the purifier is given time to clear them, he adds, but “if you sit next to a person in an airplane, this person will sneeze and cough during the entire eight-hour flight.”

Colds and flus are transmitted not just by air, but also by people touching surfaces, Dr. Bischoff adds. It’s always a good idea to avoid touching your nose or mouth after touching the back of an airline seat. The Cincinnati researchers also found the Minimate prototype reduced the concentration of “viable” airborne bacteria, defined as bacteria that grow well on a petri dish, Dr. Grinshpun says. It isn’t known exactly what causes the inactivation of bacteria, he says. Headwaters’s Mr. Anderson and Stanley Weinberg, CEO and chairman of Wein, both say that while it’s difficult to test the devices for real-world benefits, customer feedback has been positive. Scientists caution that the antibacterial effect could be caused by a gaseous byproduct of the device, such as ozone, an air pollutant. Both Messrs. Anderson and Weinberg say their devices produce negligible amounts of ozone. Mr. Weinberg adds that the Minimate has also tested negative for hydrogen-peroxide emission. In 2006, a personal air purifier exploded on a Continental Airlines flight, according to a National Transportation Safety Board report.

According to the report, the problem was probably caused by the user recharging a non-rechargeable battery; there were no serious injuries. The device, called the Fresh Air Buddy and formerly manufactured by Wein for another company, is no longer made, says Mr. Weinberg. Whether you’re allowed to take an air purifier on an airplane depends on the carrier. United Airlines, which now owns Continental,% doesn’t allow the air purifiers in the cabin based on the results of an “internal review,” a spokeswoman says. There is no Federal Aviation Administration restriction on carrying personal air purifiers on board, but each airline can make its own call, an FAA spokeswoman says.Right-Wing Media Distort Hillary Clinton's Comments To Falsely Claim She Endorsed Hamas July 29, 2014 8:11 PM EDT Right-wing media selectively edited comments made by Hillary Clinton to falsely accuse her of endorsing Hamas' extremist tactics. But Clinton made clear that Israel has a right to defend itself and credited its measures to decrease civilian casualties.

In an interview with Fusion TV's Jorge Ramos, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renewed her support for a cease-fire to end the current Israeli/Hamas conflict. Right-wing media outlets co-opted Clinton's interview to dishonestly claim that Clinton was justifying Hamas' tactics and endorsing the extremist group. On July 29, the Washington Free Beacon distorted Clinton's comments, portraying them as justification of Hamas' tactics in an article headlined "Hillary: Hamas Uses Human Shields Because 'Gaza is Pretty Small.'" On Fox News' The Five, co-host Andrea Tantaros accused Clinton of "trying to make an excuse for Hamas" and defending Hamas "for hiding rockets in places like schools." But the full context of the interview shows that Clinton credited Israel's attempts to prevent civilian casualties by sending warnings before airstrikes and said that "obviously Israel has a right to self-defense." Clinton noted that "any kind of conflict" has civilian casualties, but Gaza's small size and Hamas' tactics make them more acute (emphasis added):