1.75-Quart Dendrobium Orchid (L20934hp) Item # 53039 Model # NURSERY Image shown of mature plant; shop your local Lowe's for plants specific to your growing zone Attractive flower and colors Great gift for Mother's Day Container/Package Unit of MeasureSearch for a Rebate To find a rebate, search for a rebate by brand. Search for a rebate by using the following criteria: View a complete listing of all rebatesHome Above Ground PoolsSwimming Pool Filter Systems Comparison GuideAbove Ground PoolsBuying GuidesIn Ground PoolsMar 5, 2014Customers often ask us, what pool filter makes the most sense for my swimming pool? To answer this we need to consider local weather and personal preferences. For example, do you live in a windy, dusty climate, creating dirt in your pool or an environment with little or no debris? Sand filters are exactly what they sound like. Sand Filters consist of large tanks filled with sand. The water gets pushed through the sand which filters out any contaminants before they end up in your pool, thus clarifying your water.

Sand Filters remove particles as low as 20 microns which become caught within the grains of sand. Eventually the particles will block more and more water, raising the pressure in the filter. This will cause your filtration system to backwash or flush out the system by reversing the water throughout the filter. Sand lasts 7 years Requires backwashing (almost weekly) Wastes water through backwashing Filters down to 20-25 microns Creates the most pressure, making it less energy efficient Some local codes can restrict backwashing Cartridge Filters are energy efficient, cost effective, and readily available. They consist of a filter cartridge which sits in a tank smaller than that of a sand filter and filters water through the large surface area of the filter. The cartridge’s clarity lands in the middle, filtering down to 5 microns which are picked up through the paper-like material within the cartridge. Because the filter has a large surface area it creates the least resistance and works the best under lower speeds.

The cartridge filter can be taken out and sprayed down with a hose for cleaning and doesn’t require backwashing. Filters good at lower speeds for energy efficiency Traps particles as small as 5-10 microns Cartridges are readily available and affordable More maintenance than sand filters Cartridges need to be replaced more often (every three years or so) Have to clean the cartridges once or twice a season D.E. or Diatomaceous Earth Filters use mined fossilized exoskeletons of tiny diatoms to filter out particles. The D.E. Filter consists of a tank with a grids inside coated with D.E. Powder. The D.E. Powder acts like sand catching particles but on a much smaller scale. It catches particles as small as 3 microns, giving the clearest water out of the three filters, but not without a higher price. The D.E. Filters have a little pricier upkeep than Sand or Cartridge Filters, requiring you to replace D.E. Powder every time you have to backwash the filter.

You can do this easily by adding D.E. Powder to your skimmer but you will have to give the filter a thorough cleaning once a year. Filters particles as small as 5-10 microns D.E. can be added through your skimmer D.E. Powder is carcinogenic in it’s powder form Grids need to be cleaned once a yearkenmore hepa supreme air cleaner Higher resistance than cartridge filtersmiele s 512 super air clean beutel In terms of overall performance our pick goes to the Cartridge Filter. eureka forbes air purifier o2The Cartridge Filter allows for an energy efficient, cost effective system, that still provides you with clear water. It does this by having a large surface area which allows for great filtration while being able to allow pump speeds to remain low.

The lower the speed, the lower the pressure and friction in the lines, thus decreasing the amount of energy consumed by your pump. Cartridge filters, in some cases, require an additional cleaning in the pool season but we think it’s worth the efficiency. Although we have chosen a cartridge filter for the overall choice there are still going to be people who prefer the clearest water available (D.E.) or the system with the least amount of maintenance (Sand). It all depends on what your needs are based on, the environment the pool is located in, and your preferred level of maintenance. Either way you want to make sure that your pool and equipment fit the size and characteristics of the filter you chose or it can turn out to be more work than you might have bargained for. If you have any questions about filters or your pool system in general leave a comment below or give one of our knowledgeable staff members a shout. We’d love to help you out. Free Pool Closing ChecklistSep 22, 2016

It’s the End of the Pool Season! How many chemicals do I need to buy? Top 10 Winterizing ProductsSep 15, 2016 Winter Covers – The Cheap Investment to Protect Your Large InvestmentSep 7, 2016The use of activated carbon to remove harmful impurities like organic contaminants from water has been practiced since Roman times. Activated carbon is the generic term used to describe a family of carbonaceous adsorbents with a highly amorphous form and extensively developed internal pore structure. Activated carbon is extremely porous with a very large surface area, which makes it an effective adsorbent material. This large surface area relative to the size of the actual carbon particle makes it easy to remove large amounts of impurities in a relatively small enclosed space. An approximate ratio of surface area is one square meter per gram. The intermolecular attractions in the smallest pores result in adsorption. The molecules of the contaminants in the water are adsorbed on to the surface of the activated carbon by either physical or chemical attraction.

Physical attraction does not alter the adsorbate molecular structure; chemical adsorption results in changing the adsorbate molecular structure. Some like to refer to these two phenomenon as physisorption (physical adsorption) and chemisorption (chemical adsorption). The two mechanisms by which the chemicals are adsorbed onto activated carbon are either it ‘dislikes’ water or it attracts into the activated carbon. Activated carbon adsorption proceeds through three basic steps: Many natural substances are used as base materials to make activated carbon. The most common of these used in water purification are lignite, bituminous and anthracite coal and peat, wood and coconut shell. Different base materials and the activation process results in unique pore size and pore distribution. The pore size grouping in carbon is commonly described by its pore diameter. Macropores (above 50 nanometers [nm] in diameter); mesopores (two to 50 nm diameter) and micropores (under two nm diameter).

Another way to think of and visualize pore structure is transport and adsorption pores: transport pores bring adsorables to the adsorption pores. Coconut shell-based activated carbons are the least dusty. Predominantly microporous, they are well-suited for organic chemical adsorption. Coconut shell-based carbon has the highest hardness compared to other types of activated carbons, which makes it the ideal carbon for water purification. In terms of base materials, coconut shell and wood are renewable resources. Coconut plantations with millions of acres of land continue to provide all the benefits of green trees to our environment in spite of using billions of coconut shells per year for activation. Activated carbon is produced from coconut shells in a two-step process. The first step in activation is to carbonize the shells to drive about two-thirds of the volatiles out of the shells, creating a carbonaceous mass full of tiny pores. In the second stage, this carbonized base material is activated at high temperature (1,100°C/2,012°F) in steam.

Activation temperature and the amount of activation time are important to create the internal pore networks and to impart certain surface chemistries (functional group) inside each particle. In essence, the total activation process gives carbon its unique adsorption characteristics. The process of carbonization is to convert coconut shells to char or charcoal. The charring process (the making of charcoal) is known as pyrolysis, which is the chemical decomposition of the shell by heating in the absence of oxygen. During the carbonization of coconut shells, volatiles amounting to 70 percent of the mass of the coconut shells are released into the atmosphere, yielding 30 percent of the coconut shell mass as charcoal. The volatiles released during the carbonization process are methane, CO2, water vapor and a wide range of organic vapors. Coconut shells are carbonized in an age-old process commonly known as the open-pit method. In this process, earth is used as an insulator and to heat the shells in the absence of oxygen.

The pit charcoaling cycle consists of three stages: The temperature maintained in the process is vital for complete pyrolysis. Experiments have shown that the charcoal yield is directly proportional to the temperature in the pits. In addition, the amount of methane released into the atmosphere is directly related to the temperature in the pit. By and large, pits yield 30 percent char, which means they maintain a temperature of 500°C (932°F). Several experiments have been conducted to measure the amount of gases released; on average, one million ton (MT) of coconut shells releases about 12 to 15 Kg of methane into the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases insulate the Earth from the cold of space. As incoming solar radiations are adsorbed and re-emitted back from the Earth’s surface as infrared energy, greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere prevent a portion of this heat from escaping into space, instead re-emitting the energy back to further warm the surface. Human activities are amplifying the natural greenhouse effect.

Our emissions of GHGs are modifying the Earth’s energy balance between incoming solar radiation and the heat released back into space, resulting in climate change. Climate change can alter temperature, precipitation and sea levels and may adversely impact human and natural systems, including water resources, human health and settlements and the biodiversity of our ecosystems. The apparent acceleration of the climate change model over the last 50 years and the increasing confidence in global climate model results adds to the compelling evidence that climate is being effected by GHG emissions from human activities. If this is true, we all must do what we can to limit GHGs. There are several GHGs, of which water vapor, methane and carbon dioxide are both naturally accruing and industrially generated. CO2 and methane are emitted primarily from fossil fuel combustion. Land-use changes and deforestation are significant sources of CO2 emission. India, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Indonesia are the primary countries that char coconut shells for activation to be used in water and air purification.

Several countries in the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) region in recent years have started doing so as well. A conservative estimate is that in the four leading countries, about 350 MT/year of methane is emitted to the atmosphere by the pit method of charring. This is the equivalent of the CO2 emitted by 350,000 mid-size cars driven 20,000 miles per year. Methane is four times more effective (and therefore, detrimental) as a GHG compared to CO2. In the pit method of charring coconut shells, GHGs are emitted to the atmosphere without any control and treatment of effluent gases. Recently, a company has developed a novel process working with the Indian Institute of Science (Bangalore) to char the coconut shells in a reactor, thereby capturing the GHGs and using them under controlled conditions for the production of thermal energy. Coconut shells contain cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin, which an average composition of C6 H10 O5 with slight variations depending on the nature of the biomass.

Theoretically, the ratio of air-to-fuel required for the complete combustion of the shells, defined as stoichiometric (pertaining to or involving substances that are in the exact proportions required for a given reaction) combustion, is 6:1 to 6.5:1 with the end products of CO2 and H2O. In this new process, the combustion is carried out in sub-stoichiometric conditions, with the air-to-fuel ratio being 1.5:1 and 1.8:1. The gas so obtained is called producer gas, which is combustible. This process is made possible in a device called a ‘char reactor’ in a limited supply of air. Two reactions take place: oxidation and reduction. The first part of the sub-stoichiometric oxidation (air with shells) leads to the loss of volatiles from the shells and is exothermic. It results in peak temperatures of 800°C (1,472°F) and the generation of gaseous products like carbon monoxide and hydrogen (in the same proportions) and carbon dioxide and water vapor, which, in turn, are reduced in part to carbon monoxide and hydrogen by the hot bed of charcoal generated during the gasification process.

Reduction reaction is endothermic; generating combustible products like CO, H2 and CH4 as indicated below. C + CO2 —> 2CO C + H2O —> CO + H2 C + 2H2 —> CH4 Since char is generated during the gasification process, the entire operation is self-sustaining. The development of the state-of-the-art technology wherein the shells are fed from the top with a twin air entry re-burn process by the company is the critical element. This process consists of a fuel and ash handling system, a gasification system reactor and gas cooling and cleaning systems. The process is unique and prevents tar formation during pyrolysis. The char produced in this process is of consistently good quality compared to that produced by the open pit method. It has a consistent, high iodine value and is free from contaminants coming from the pit, such as soil, silica and pebbles. This char forms a good base material for the activation process, enabling high performance. Dr. P.A. Shankar is chief technology cfficer for Singapore-based Filtrex Holdings Group.